<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 602 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116086</link>
    <description>The six-month re-export period under Notification No. 158/95-Cus. is to be reckoned from the date of actual clearance and possession of the imported goods, not from the date of filing or final assessment of the bill of entry. Applying that interpretation, the text notes that re-export within six months of taking possession supported the appellant&#039;s case and established a prima facie basis for unconditional stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 602 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116086</link>
      <description>The six-month re-export period under Notification No. 158/95-Cus. is to be reckoned from the date of actual clearance and possession of the imported goods, not from the date of filing or final assessment of the bill of entry. Applying that interpretation, the text notes that re-export within six months of taking possession supported the appellant&#039;s case and established a prima facie basis for unconditional stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>