https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116085 The Appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Undertaking, faced duty demand due to failure to produce proof of export within six months. Despite submitting proof later, an Order-in-Original was issued in 1999, leading to a dismissed appeal in 2003. The dispute centered on the service of the order, with the Tribunal ruling that the 2003 appeal was not time-barred as proper service was lacking. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a decision on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals). en-us Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:24:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116085 The Appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Undertaking, faced duty demand due to failure to produce proof of export within six months. Despite submitting proof later, an Order-in-Original was issued in 1999, leading to a dismissed appeal in 2003. The dispute centered on the service of the order, with the Tribunal ruling that the 2003 appeal was not time-barred as proper service was lacking. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a decision on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals). Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116085