<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 499 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116083</link>
    <description>Declared value of imported goods cannot be enhanced on the basis of comparison with imports that are materially different in country of origin and time of import. The tribunal found that reliance on similar goods imported from Taiwan, when the goods under assessment were imported from China and in a different period, was not a proper basis for valuation. The enhancement was therefore set aside. The classification challenge did not survive because it had already been conceded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 499 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116083</link>
      <description>Declared value of imported goods cannot be enhanced on the basis of comparison with imports that are materially different in country of origin and time of import. The tribunal found that reliance on similar goods imported from Taiwan, when the goods under assessment were imported from China and in a different period, was not a proper basis for valuation. The enhancement was therefore set aside. The classification challenge did not survive because it had already been conceded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>