https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116040 The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeals due to non-receipt of the order by the applicants. The applicants received only a photocopy of the order after a significant delay, which was attributed to the possession of the factory by another party. The Tribunal found the grounds presented by the applicants valid for condonation of the delay and scheduled the stay applications for hearing on 5th July, 2005. en-us Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:54:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116040 The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeals due to non-receipt of the order by the applicants. The applicants received only a photocopy of the order after a significant delay, which was attributed to the possession of the factory by another party. The Tribunal found the grounds presented by the applicants valid for condonation of the delay and scheduled the stay applications for hearing on 5th July, 2005. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116040