<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 388 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116037</link>
    <description>Customs penalties and confiscation for import misdeclaration require evidence of conscious involvement or a legally sustainable basis to attribute the misdeclaration. A shipping agent and clearing agent acting on pre-arrival documents describing goods as scrap are not liable without proof of culpable participation. Cancellation of an importer&#039;s original bills of entry with the proper officer&#039;s approval, followed by clearance under fresh bills, does not by itself preserve penal liability. Declared transaction value for scrap cannot be rejected merely by reference to higher-priced imports of different origins or quantities; reliable contemporaneous evidence must justify departure from the actual price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 388 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116037</link>
      <description>Customs penalties and confiscation for import misdeclaration require evidence of conscious involvement or a legally sustainable basis to attribute the misdeclaration. A shipping agent and clearing agent acting on pre-arrival documents describing goods as scrap are not liable without proof of culpable participation. Cancellation of an importer&#039;s original bills of entry with the proper officer&#039;s approval, followed by clearance under fresh bills, does not by itself preserve penal liability. Declared transaction value for scrap cannot be rejected merely by reference to higher-priced imports of different origins or quantities; reliable contemporaneous evidence must justify departure from the actual price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>