https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116029 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation and penalties imposed on the appellants for importing HCFC under the brand names Forane and Solkane. The Tribunal emphasized the validity of the revalidated import licence, the equivalence of the brand names, and compliance with international protocols and legal provisions, ultimately rejecting the confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. en-us Wed, 25 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:18:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116029 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the confiscation and penalties imposed on the appellants for importing HCFC under the brand names Forane and Solkane. The Tribunal emphasized the validity of the revalidated import licence, the equivalence of the brand names, and compliance with international protocols and legal provisions, ultimately rejecting the confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 25 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116029