<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 440 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of duty and penalty, along with a waiver of pre-deposit, pending the appeal&#039;s hearing. The applicants successfully argued that certain show cause notices were time-barred and that the transportation charges collected in excess were justifiable based on the agreement with the purchaser. The Tribunal found in favor of the applicants, allowing the stay application and scheduling the appeal for a final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:29:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 440 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay on the recovery of duty and penalty, along with a waiver of pre-deposit, pending the appeal&#039;s hearing. The applicants successfully argued that certain show cause notices were time-barred and that the transportation charges collected in excess were justifiable based on the agreement with the purchaser. The Tribunal found in favor of the applicants, allowing the stay application and scheduling the appeal for a final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>