<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 432 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal recalled the stay order, allowed the stay petition unconditionally, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits. The dismissal of the appeal based on delay was deemed unjustified as the appeal was filed within the time limit, albeit in a different office initially. The lack of opportunity for a hearing before passing the order was considered a procedural flaw, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and directing a decision on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:59:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 432 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal recalled the stay order, allowed the stay petition unconditionally, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits. The dismissal of the appeal based on delay was deemed unjustified as the appeal was filed within the time limit, albeit in a different office initially. The lack of opportunity for a hearing before passing the order was considered a procedural flaw, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and directing a decision on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>