<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 431 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the stay petition unconditionally on the point of limitation. The decision emphasized the appellant&#039;s compliance with the conditions of Notification No. 208/83, the alleged suppression of information, and the issue of limitation in the assessment process. It underscored the significance of maintaining statutory documents and demonstrating good faith in dealings with revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:50:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 431 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the stay petition unconditionally on the point of limitation. The decision emphasized the appellant&#039;s compliance with the conditions of Notification No. 208/83, the alleged suppression of information, and the issue of limitation in the assessment process. It underscored the significance of maintaining statutory documents and demonstrating good faith in dealings with revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>