<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 425 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision confirming the enhanced assessable value and duty of imported goods due to misdeclaration. The appellant&#039;s admission, supported by price quotations and statements detailing the modus operandi, served as incriminating evidence. Despite concerns about the adjudication process, the Tribunal found the appellant had sufficient opportunities to participate, leading to the rejection of the appeal except for a reduction in the personal penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 425 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision confirming the enhanced assessable value and duty of imported goods due to misdeclaration. The appellant&#039;s admission, supported by price quotations and statements detailing the modus operandi, served as incriminating evidence. Despite concerns about the adjudication process, the Tribunal found the appellant had sufficient opportunities to participate, leading to the rejection of the appeal except for a reduction in the personal penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>