<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 419 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115993</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the duty and penalty amounts demanded from the appellants for the period from March 2000 to March 2002. The judgment highlighted inconsistencies in the Commissioner&#039;s assessment of the assessee&#039;s business, leading to conflicting conclusions regarding their status as a manufacturer or hired laborers. By emphasizing the importance of consistent findings and upholding principles of natural justice, the tribunal supported the appellants&#039; argument against the duty demand, ensuring fair treatment in the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 419 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115993</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the duty and penalty amounts demanded from the appellants for the period from March 2000 to March 2002. The judgment highlighted inconsistencies in the Commissioner&#039;s assessment of the assessee&#039;s business, leading to conflicting conclusions regarding their status as a manufacturer or hired laborers. By emphasizing the importance of consistent findings and upholding principles of natural justice, the tribunal supported the appellants&#039; argument against the duty demand, ensuring fair treatment in the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>