https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115992 The tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on various individuals under the Customs Act, finding no evidence of intentional evasion of customs duty. It concluded that the appellants had substantially complied with the DEEC scheme and that errors in logging exports were not solely attributable to the exporters. The tribunal allowed the appeals with consequential relief, determining that the penalties were unwarranted as there was no mala fide intent or deliberate fraud evidenced in the case. en-us Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:28:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115992 The tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on various individuals under the Customs Act, finding no evidence of intentional evasion of customs duty. It concluded that the appellants had substantially complied with the DEEC scheme and that errors in logging exports were not solely attributable to the exporters. The tribunal allowed the appeals with consequential relief, determining that the penalties were unwarranted as there was no mala fide intent or deliberate fraud evidenced in the case. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115992