<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 646 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115984</link>
    <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal and ordered the refund of the redemption fine deposited by the appellants during the pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal. The Commissioner dropped the duty demand for a specific period and acknowledged the duty payment for that period. The appellate authority found merit in the appeal solely on the issue of refunding the redemption fine, leading to the final outcome in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 646 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115984</link>
      <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal and ordered the refund of the redemption fine deposited by the appellants during the pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal. The Commissioner dropped the duty demand for a specific period and acknowledged the duty payment for that period. The appellate authority found merit in the appeal solely on the issue of refunding the redemption fine, leading to the final outcome in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>