https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115968 The appellants successfully appealed against the denial of the SSI exemption notification benefit for the period from October 1999 to March 2000. The court found that the appellants had ceased using the foreign brand name 'ATR' from April 1, 1999, and provided evidence of informing the department about this change. As the appellants exceeded the SSI exemption limit even after discontinuing the use of the foreign brand name, they were deemed entitled to the exemption benefit from April 1, 1999. Consequently, the duty demand imposed on the appellants was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:18:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115968 The appellants successfully appealed against the denial of the SSI exemption notification benefit for the period from October 1999 to March 2000. The court found that the appellants had ceased using the foreign brand name 'ATR' from April 1, 1999, and provided evidence of informing the department about this change. As the appellants exceeded the SSI exemption limit even after discontinuing the use of the foreign brand name, they were deemed entitled to the exemption benefit from April 1, 1999. Consequently, the duty demand imposed on the appellants was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115968