https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115961 The court rejected the application for rectification of mistake in the Tribunal's Final Order, as the discrepancy in the date mentioned did not meet the criteria of being a mistake apparent from the record under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act. The judges emphasized the necessity of errors being clearly evident in the record for rectification. The decision underscores the importance of accurate documentation in legal proceedings to maintain the integrity of assessments and judicial processes. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:29:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115961 The court rejected the application for rectification of mistake in the Tribunal's Final Order, as the discrepancy in the date mentioned did not meet the criteria of being a mistake apparent from the record under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act. The judges emphasized the necessity of errors being clearly evident in the record for rectification. The decision underscores the importance of accurate documentation in legal proceedings to maintain the integrity of assessments and judicial processes. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115961