<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 621 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115960</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, rejected the appeal concerning a refund claim for imported goods classification under Chapter Heading 1301.90 or 1302.19. The Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision to deny the refund claim was upheld, emphasizing that since the assessment order was not challenged and had become final, the refund claim was not maintainable. Legal precedents were cited to support this conclusion, leading to the rejection of the appeal based on established legal principles and previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 621 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115960</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, rejected the appeal concerning a refund claim for imported goods classification under Chapter Heading 1301.90 or 1302.19. The Commissioner of Customs&#039; decision to deny the refund claim was upheld, emphasizing that since the assessment order was not challenged and had become final, the refund claim was not maintainable. Legal precedents were cited to support this conclusion, leading to the rejection of the appeal based on established legal principles and previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>