https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115955 The Tribunal set aside the orders due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act and lack of proper Annual Capacity of Production (ACP) determination by the Commissioner. The appeals were remanded for further consideration without the pre-deposit requirement, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment and adherence to legal procedures. en-us Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:49:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115955 The Tribunal set aside the orders due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act and lack of proper Annual Capacity of Production (ACP) determination by the Commissioner. The appeals were remanded for further consideration without the pre-deposit requirement, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment and adherence to legal procedures. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115955