<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 675 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted an extension of the stay of recovery of duty in a case where appellants sought relief following a negative ruling by the Apex Court. The appellants argued their assessments were provisional, highlighting a strong prima facie case against the duty demand. The Tribunal considered the absence of a stay order under Section 35C (2A) of the Central Excise Act and the procedural complexities, ultimately extending the stay until the final appeal disposal. The judgment underscores the importance of distinguishing between provisional and non-provisional assessments and ensuring justice and fairness in the adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:10:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 675 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted an extension of the stay of recovery of duty in a case where appellants sought relief following a negative ruling by the Apex Court. The appellants argued their assessments were provisional, highlighting a strong prima facie case against the duty demand. The Tribunal considered the absence of a stay order under Section 35C (2A) of the Central Excise Act and the procedural complexities, ultimately extending the stay until the final appeal disposal. The judgment underscores the importance of distinguishing between provisional and non-provisional assessments and ensuring justice and fairness in the adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>