https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115904 Confiscation of goods could not be sustained merely because they were not entered in the RG-I register, where the goods were found in the packing department and the record contained no material showing clandestine clearance or an attempt to remove them. Non-entry by itself was treated as insufficient; liability required corroborative evidence of an intention to clear unaccounted goods. On that basis, the confiscation order was set aside and consequential relief followed. en-us Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:01:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115904 Confiscation of goods could not be sustained merely because they were not entered in the RG-I register, where the goods were found in the packing department and the record contained no material showing clandestine clearance or an attempt to remove them. Non-entry by itself was treated as insufficient; liability required corroborative evidence of an intention to clear unaccounted goods. On that basis, the confiscation order was set aside and consequential relief followed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115904