https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115903 Exceeding the monthly production ceiling under Notification No. 22/1982-C.E. disentitled the manufacturer from the concession for the entire financial year. The Tribunal followed earlier orders, including the Special Bench view, that the limit was month-specific and that breach in any calendar month ? No, avoid non-English. Breach in any calendar month meant the notification benefit could not be claimed for the whole year. Applying that settled position, it held that the respondent, having crossed the limit in September 1992, was not entitled to the concession for financial year 1992-1993. en-us Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:51:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115903 Exceeding the monthly production ceiling under Notification No. 22/1982-C.E. disentitled the manufacturer from the concession for the entire financial year. The Tribunal followed earlier orders, including the Special Bench view, that the limit was month-specific and that breach in any calendar month ? No, avoid non-English. Breach in any calendar month meant the notification benefit could not be claimed for the whole year. Applying that settled position, it held that the respondent, having crossed the limit in September 1992, was not entitled to the concession for financial year 1992-1993. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115903