<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 552 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115899</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order, allowing the appeal due to insufficient evidence for clandestine removal allegations. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on private records without corroborative proof of raw material procurement, manufacturing, and sale was deemed inadequate. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence, noting the absence of excess electricity usage and relevant personnel examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 552 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115899</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order, allowing the appeal due to insufficient evidence for clandestine removal allegations. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on private records without corroborative proof of raw material procurement, manufacturing, and sale was deemed inadequate. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence, noting the absence of excess electricity usage and relevant personnel examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>