<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 551 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the timeliness requirement for taking credit as per Notification 29/2000-C.E. (N.T.), dismissed the appellant&#039;s financial hardship claim due to lack of evidence, and ordered partial payment of Rs. 2,00,000 within eight weeks, with the remaining duty and penalty to be dispensed with. Compliance and hearing were set for 4th April 2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:57:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 551 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the timeliness requirement for taking credit as per Notification 29/2000-C.E. (N.T.), dismissed the appellant&#039;s financial hardship claim due to lack of evidence, and ordered partial payment of Rs. 2,00,000 within eight weeks, with the remaining duty and penalty to be dispensed with. Compliance and hearing were set for 4th April 2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>