<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 545 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115892</link>
    <description>Packaged goods that are exempt from statutory MRP declaration under Rule 34B of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 may be valued under Section 4 rather than Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. In this matter, the dispute concerned 2 gm pouches and whether duty and penalty demanded on an MRP-based valuation required pre-deposit. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case that, since MRP declaration was not legally required, the appellant could contest assessment under the MRP-based regime. On that basis, complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted as interim relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:34:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 545 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115892</link>
      <description>Packaged goods that are exempt from statutory MRP declaration under Rule 34B of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 may be valued under Section 4 rather than Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. In this matter, the dispute concerned 2 gm pouches and whether duty and penalty demanded on an MRP-based valuation required pre-deposit. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case that, since MRP declaration was not legally required, the appellant could contest assessment under the MRP-based regime. On that basis, complete waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted as interim relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>