<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 538 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115885</link>
    <description>Refunds under Notification No. 33/99-C.E., as amended by Notification No. 61/2002-C.E., had to be computed after reducing the Cenvat credit availed on inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of the cleared goods. The amended proviso capped the refund at the duty paid less such input credit, and the refund sanctions made during the relevant period were correctly calculated on that basis. As the claims were properly restricted by the Cenvat credit availed in the respective months, it was unnecessary to decide whether the amendment operated retrospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:45:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 538 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115885</link>
      <description>Refunds under Notification No. 33/99-C.E., as amended by Notification No. 61/2002-C.E., had to be computed after reducing the Cenvat credit availed on inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of the cleared goods. The amended proviso capped the refund at the duty paid less such input credit, and the refund sanctions made during the relevant period were correctly calculated on that basis. As the claims were properly restricted by the Cenvat credit availed in the respective months, it was unnecessary to decide whether the amendment operated retrospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>