<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 525 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115872</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s duty demand regarding Molasses used in Ethyl Alcohol production was the subject of the case. The appellant contended that Molasses should be considered an intermediate product, as they had already paid 8% duty on Ethyl Alcohol. The appellant was permitted to forgo pre-deposits, and the recovery of the demand was halted pending the outcome of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:30:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 525 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115872</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s duty demand regarding Molasses used in Ethyl Alcohol production was the subject of the case. The appellant contended that Molasses should be considered an intermediate product, as they had already paid 8% duty on Ethyl Alcohol. The appellant was permitted to forgo pre-deposits, and the recovery of the demand was halted pending the outcome of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>