https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115865 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai rejected an application seeking rectification of a mistake apparent from its final order. The Tribunal highlighted its limited jurisdiction under Section 35C, especially when a Civil Appeal against its order is pending before the Supreme Court. By emphasizing that the department opted to pursue relief in the higher court, the Tribunal indicated that more than an apparent error was alleged in its order, leading to the rejection of the rectification application. en-us Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:14:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115865 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai rejected an application seeking rectification of a mistake apparent from its final order. The Tribunal highlighted its limited jurisdiction under Section 35C, especially when a Civil Appeal against its order is pending before the Supreme Court. By emphasizing that the department opted to pursue relief in the higher court, the Tribunal indicated that more than an apparent error was alleged in its order, leading to the rejection of the rectification application. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115865