<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 514 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115861</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the excisability of Aluminium Circles and Strips they manufactured. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal held that the processes involved did not amount to manufacturing under the relevant law. Consequently, the impugned duty imposition was set aside, and the appellants&#039; appeal was allowed with any lawful consequential relief. The decision was pronounced on 4-1-2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:56:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 514 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115861</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the excisability of Aluminium Circles and Strips they manufactured. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal held that the processes involved did not amount to manufacturing under the relevant law. Consequently, the impugned duty imposition was set aside, and the appellants&#039; appeal was allowed with any lawful consequential relief. The decision was pronounced on 4-1-2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>