https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115844 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, condoned the 43-day delay in filing the appeal due to the unavailability of a Consultant in Bilaspur, as argued by the Appellant's Advocate. The Tribunal considered the limited availability of legal advisors in Central Excise Law in Bilaspur, M.P., and noted the Appellants' efforts to seek legal advice promptly. As the disputed amount was already deposited, the appeal was scheduled for a hearing, with the order pronounced in open court on 22-12-2004. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:47:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115844 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, condoned the 43-day delay in filing the appeal due to the unavailability of a Consultant in Bilaspur, as argued by the Appellant's Advocate. The Tribunal considered the limited availability of legal advisors in Central Excise Law in Bilaspur, M.P., and noted the Appellants' efforts to seek legal advice promptly. As the disputed amount was already deposited, the appeal was scheduled for a hearing, with the order pronounced in open court on 22-12-2004. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115844