<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 557 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115816</link>
    <description>Deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. (N.T.) was admissible only where the suppliers&#039; invoices carried the required declaration that duty had been discharged; credit was denied for inputs covered by deficient invoices and allowed for inputs supported by compliant declarations. The beneficiary was required to verify that the supplier declarations met the notification conditions before taking the concession, so failure to exercise due diligence justified penalty. The penalty was sustained, but the amount was reduced as excessive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 557 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115816</link>
      <description>Deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97-C.E. (N.T.) was admissible only where the suppliers&#039; invoices carried the required declaration that duty had been discharged; credit was denied for inputs covered by deficient invoices and allowed for inputs supported by compliant declarations. The beneficiary was required to verify that the supplier declarations met the notification conditions before taking the concession, so failure to exercise due diligence justified penalty. The penalty was sustained, but the amount was reduced as excessive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>