<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 553 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found an error in denying credit based on gate passes with multiple endorsements, clarifying that Modvat credit could be claimed on such gate passes. The decision overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) ruling and allowed the appeal, affirming the admissibility of credit on gate passes with more than two endorsements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:18:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 553 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found an error in denying credit based on gate passes with multiple endorsements, clarifying that Modvat credit could be claimed on such gate passes. The decision overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) ruling and allowed the appeal, affirming the admissibility of credit on gate passes with more than two endorsements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>