<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 549 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115808</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief to the appellant. The denial of deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97 due to supplier&#039;s duty payment dispute under the compounded levy scheme was deemed unjustified as the appellant was discharging duty under the compounded levy scheme without dispute, entitling them to the credit provided on a deemed basis at 12% of the price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 549 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115808</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief to the appellant. The denial of deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97 due to supplier&#039;s duty payment dispute under the compounded levy scheme was deemed unjustified as the appellant was discharging duty under the compounded levy scheme without dispute, entitling them to the credit provided on a deemed basis at 12% of the price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>