<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 547 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and staying recovery unconditionally. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to charge duty based on the supplier&#039;s sale price was overturned, with the Tribunal emphasizing the binding nature of the Larger Bench judgment. Despite the opposition from the Commissioner and the SDR, the Tribunal found merit in the appellants&#039; case, granting a full waiver of pre-deposit due to the strong grounds presented in the appeal. The Tribunal prioritized the merits of the case over financial hardship, allowing the stay application and scheduling the appeal for a final hearing on a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 547 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and staying recovery unconditionally. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to charge duty based on the supplier&#039;s sale price was overturned, with the Tribunal emphasizing the binding nature of the Larger Bench judgment. Despite the opposition from the Commissioner and the SDR, the Tribunal found merit in the appellants&#039; case, granting a full waiver of pre-deposit due to the strong grounds presented in the appeal. The Tribunal prioritized the merits of the case over financial hardship, allowing the stay application and scheduling the appeal for a final hearing on a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>