<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 476 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115787</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied on inputs sent to job workers where no credit had been taken on those inputs, and reversal was not required for such removals. The tribunal also noted that certain challans and waste removals had not been properly considered, raising a natural justice defect. In any event, the alleged duty liability could be adjusted against the assessee&#039;s undisputed credit balance, so it was not sustainable as a separate recoverable demand. Penalties on the assessee and its director were unsustainable because fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement, or any specific culpable role by the director had not been established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:17:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 476 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115787</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied on inputs sent to job workers where no credit had been taken on those inputs, and reversal was not required for such removals. The tribunal also noted that certain challans and waste removals had not been properly considered, raising a natural justice defect. In any event, the alleged duty liability could be adjusted against the assessee&#039;s undisputed credit balance, so it was not sustainable as a separate recoverable demand. Penalties on the assessee and its director were unsustainable because fraud, suppression, wilful misstatement, or any specific culpable role by the director had not been established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>