https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115769 The appellate court set aside the order rejecting the refund claim based on unjust enrichment, remanding the matter for a fresh decision. The appellants were granted the opportunity to prove non-passing of duty incidence to customers, emphasizing the importance of justice and fairness in the proceedings. This decision favored the appellants, allowing them the chance to present evidence and potentially secure the refund claim initially denied. en-us Wed, 03 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:21:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115769 The appellate court set aside the order rejecting the refund claim based on unjust enrichment, remanding the matter for a fresh decision. The appellants were granted the opportunity to prove non-passing of duty incidence to customers, emphasizing the importance of justice and fairness in the proceedings. This decision favored the appellants, allowing them the chance to present evidence and potentially secure the refund claim initially denied. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115769