<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 453 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115764</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, comprising Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram and Shri Moheb Ali M., granted relief to the appellants by waiving the pre-deposit of penalties totaling Rs. 6.00 lakhs imposed on a company and its director following an order of confiscation of goods by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs, Surat-I. The Tribunal found merit in the appellants&#039; argument that penalties could not be imposed under Section 114 when goods were not liable to confiscation under Section 113, relying on a precedent. The decision highlights the importance of legal precedent in interpreting relevant sections of the law and ensuring fairness in penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:01:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 453 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115764</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, comprising Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram and Shri Moheb Ali M., granted relief to the appellants by waiving the pre-deposit of penalties totaling Rs. 6.00 lakhs imposed on a company and its director following an order of confiscation of goods by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs, Surat-I. The Tribunal found merit in the appellants&#039; argument that penalties could not be imposed under Section 114 when goods were not liable to confiscation under Section 113, relying on a precedent. The decision highlights the importance of legal precedent in interpreting relevant sections of the law and ensuring fairness in penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>