https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115760 The Bench found discrepancies in the interest rate demanded by the Commissioner (Appeals), initially held at 20% but sought by Revenue at 24%. The appellant's cross-objection was not considered, leading to an erroneous dismissal of Revenue's appeal. The Commissioner had not confirmed the interest rate, necessitating a modification of the order. The judgment directed the Registry to list the Cross Objection for hearing to address the appellant's submissions. A factual error in the order dismissing Revenue's appeal regarding the interest rate demanded was corrected to ensure a fair resolution. en-us Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:34:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115760 The Bench found discrepancies in the interest rate demanded by the Commissioner (Appeals), initially held at 20% but sought by Revenue at 24%. The appellant's cross-objection was not considered, leading to an erroneous dismissal of Revenue's appeal. The Commissioner had not confirmed the interest rate, necessitating a modification of the order. The judgment directed the Registry to list the Cross Objection for hearing to address the appellant's submissions. A factual error in the order dismissing Revenue's appeal regarding the interest rate demanded was corrected to ensure a fair resolution. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115760