https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115754 Where the prescribed conditions for abatement were not satisfied, the duty and interest demand was sustained notwithstanding the assessee's challenge that the adjudication was confined to abatement. The Tribunal also rejected the plea of an ex parte order, noting that the assessee had been heard and had reiterated its reply in the remand proceedings. On penalty, although the demand was upheld, the Tribunal interfered with the quantum and reduced the penalty to Rs. 1,50,000, granting only partial relief. en-us Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:15:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115754 Where the prescribed conditions for abatement were not satisfied, the duty and interest demand was sustained notwithstanding the assessee's challenge that the adjudication was confined to abatement. The Tribunal also rejected the plea of an ex parte order, noting that the assessee had been heard and had reiterated its reply in the remand proceedings. On penalty, although the demand was upheld, the Tribunal interfered with the quantum and reduced the penalty to Rs. 1,50,000, granting only partial relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115754