<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 519 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115752</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on M.S. billets and M.S. rounds was denied because the authorities recorded a concurrent finding that the factory had no facility to manufacture components or spare parts from those inputs. That finding was treated as factual, and no cogent reason was shown to disturb it. The appellate forum therefore declined to interfere with the concurrent factual conclusion and sustained the Revenue&#039;s stand, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 519 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115752</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on M.S. billets and M.S. rounds was denied because the authorities recorded a concurrent finding that the factory had no facility to manufacture components or spare parts from those inputs. That finding was treated as factual, and no cogent reason was shown to disturb it. The appellate forum therefore declined to interfere with the concurrent factual conclusion and sustained the Revenue&#039;s stand, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>