<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 559 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115742</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the statutory declaration for credit under Rule 57G(5) was condonable where it was filed within the six-month period and sufficient cause could be recorded in writing. The refusal to condone was unsustainable because no reasons were given, and the beneficial nature of the credit scheme required that substantive relief under Rule 57A not be denied on a mere procedural lapse. The earlier precedent was distinguishable on facts since no declaration had been filed there. The orders rejecting credit were set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:28:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 559 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115742</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the statutory declaration for credit under Rule 57G(5) was condonable where it was filed within the six-month period and sufficient cause could be recorded in writing. The refusal to condone was unsustainable because no reasons were given, and the beneficial nature of the credit scheme required that substantive relief under Rule 57A not be denied on a mere procedural lapse. The earlier precedent was distinguishable on facts since no declaration had been filed there. The orders rejecting credit were set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>