https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115709 Where the appellant established a strong prima facie case that the imported goods were lawfully cleared and the only dispute concerned alleged absence of MRP stickers, CESTAT granted waiver of the entire pre-deposit of penalty. The tribunal accepted that the seized goods were not shown to differ from the imported goods and that no effective enquiry had been made from the importers, and it stayed recovery of the penalty pending disposal of the appeal. No pre-deposit was required at the hearing stage. en-us Wed, 21 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:28:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115709 Where the appellant established a strong prima facie case that the imported goods were lawfully cleared and the only dispute concerned alleged absence of MRP stickers, CESTAT granted waiver of the entire pre-deposit of penalty. The tribunal accepted that the seized goods were not shown to differ from the imported goods and that no effective enquiry had been made from the importers, and it stayed recovery of the penalty pending disposal of the appeal. No pre-deposit was required at the hearing stage. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 21 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115709