<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 448 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115687</link>
    <description>Imported automatic numbering machines were classified by reference to their essential description and functional character, not the material used in manufacture. The explanatory note to Heading 84.43 did not support treatment as printing machinery because the goods were specifically identifiable as hand-operated self-changing numbering stamps. On that basis, the goods fell under Customs Tariff Heading 96.11 for numbering machines, and classification under Heading 8443.60 was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:29:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 448 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115687</link>
      <description>Imported automatic numbering machines were classified by reference to their essential description and functional character, not the material used in manufacture. The explanatory note to Heading 84.43 did not support treatment as printing machinery because the goods were specifically identifiable as hand-operated self-changing numbering stamps. On that basis, the goods fell under Customs Tariff Heading 96.11 for numbering machines, and classification under Heading 8443.60 was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>