https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115684 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. It found that the adjustment of the rebate claim made by the respondents while discharging duty liability was valid under the relevant provisions of the Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) had the authority to permit the adjustment without fresh permission, and as the respondents had deposited the differential amount, the adjustment was deemed valid. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order was valid as the adjustment of the rebate claim was in accordance with the law. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:10:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115684 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. It found that the adjustment of the rebate claim made by the respondents while discharging duty liability was valid under the relevant provisions of the Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) had the authority to permit the adjustment without fresh permission, and as the respondents had deposited the differential amount, the adjustment was deemed valid. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order was valid as the adjustment of the rebate claim was in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115684