<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 441 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115658</link>
    <description>A rectification or modification application cannot be used to recall a speaking final order merely because a later clarificatory circular was not placed before the Bench earlier. Where the applicant cannot point to any mistake apparent from the record, the request is treated as an attempt to reopen a concluded decision rather than to correct an obvious error. On that basis, the CESTAT held the application not maintainable and rejected it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 17:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 441 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115658</link>
      <description>A rectification or modification application cannot be used to recall a speaking final order merely because a later clarificatory circular was not placed before the Bench earlier. Where the applicant cannot point to any mistake apparent from the record, the request is treated as an attempt to reopen a concluded decision rather than to correct an obvious error. On that basis, the CESTAT held the application not maintainable and rejected it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>