https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115641 The appeal contested the correctness of an order upholding the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the appellants for discrepancies in a consignment of Sandal Wood Oil. The second report from testing was accepted, refuting allegations against the firm in Maharashtra that supplied the goods. As the duty demands were not specific to the manufacturers or traders but the recipients, the confiscation and penalties were deemed legally incorrect. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 May 2012 16:34:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115641 The appeal contested the correctness of an order upholding the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed on the appellants for discrepancies in a consignment of Sandal Wood Oil. The second report from testing was accepted, refuting allegations against the firm in Maharashtra that supplied the goods. As the duty demands were not specific to the manufacturers or traders but the recipients, the confiscation and penalties were deemed legally incorrect. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115641