<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 435 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115632</link>
    <description>Classification of aluminium granules or powder under the Central Excise Tariff turned on the statutory definition of &quot;powder&quot; in Section XV, which requires 90% or more by weight to pass through a 1 mm sieve. The text states that classification could not be based on common parlance once the tariff provided an express definition, and the department failed to prove that the goods met the sieve test. The chemical examiner&#039;s report also did not support treatment of the sample as aluminium powder. On that basis, the product was not classifiable as aluminium powder under Heading 76.03 and was treated as unwrought aluminium under sub-heading 76.01, with exemption under Notification No. 180/88 available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 16:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 435 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115632</link>
      <description>Classification of aluminium granules or powder under the Central Excise Tariff turned on the statutory definition of &quot;powder&quot; in Section XV, which requires 90% or more by weight to pass through a 1 mm sieve. The text states that classification could not be based on common parlance once the tariff provided an express definition, and the department failed to prove that the goods met the sieve test. The chemical examiner&#039;s report also did not support treatment of the sample as aluminium powder. On that basis, the product was not classifiable as aluminium powder under Heading 76.03 and was treated as unwrought aluminium under sub-heading 76.01, with exemption under Notification No. 180/88 available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>