<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 615 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115617</link>
    <description>Benefit under Notification No. 158/95-Cus. was available only on strict compliance with its conditions, including re-export of re-imported goods within six months, extendable by a further six months, and satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner on identity of the goods. Where the goods were not re-exported within time, no extension was sought, and identity was not established to the customs authority&#039;s satisfaction, the exemption could not be retained. A claimant could not later switch to a different notification to bypass conditions already accepted. On these facts, the duty demand was sustainable and the appeal failed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:57:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 615 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115617</link>
      <description>Benefit under Notification No. 158/95-Cus. was available only on strict compliance with its conditions, including re-export of re-imported goods within six months, extendable by a further six months, and satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner on identity of the goods. Where the goods were not re-exported within time, no extension was sought, and identity was not established to the customs authority&#039;s satisfaction, the exemption could not be retained. A claimant could not later switch to a different notification to bypass conditions already accepted. On these facts, the duty demand was sustainable and the appeal failed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>