<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 656 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115614</link>
    <description>Small scale industry exemption cannot be denied merely because a product carton bears a house mark or the name of a marketing company, where the brand names have been assigned to the manufacturer. Assignment deeds for FERICH-SR and ZIFF-SR showed ownership in the respondents&#039; favour, and the objection regarding DOXYREK-DR failed because a house mark is not equivalent to another&#039;s brand name for exemption denial. The materials on record supported the respondents as brand owners, so the Revenue&#039;s ground for exclusion from exemption did not survive and the denial of exemption was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 656 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115614</link>
      <description>Small scale industry exemption cannot be denied merely because a product carton bears a house mark or the name of a marketing company, where the brand names have been assigned to the manufacturer. Assignment deeds for FERICH-SR and ZIFF-SR showed ownership in the respondents&#039; favour, and the objection regarding DOXYREK-DR failed because a house mark is not equivalent to another&#039;s brand name for exemption denial. The materials on record supported the respondents as brand owners, so the Revenue&#039;s ground for exclusion from exemption did not survive and the denial of exemption was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>