<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 424 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application, correcting the redemption fine amount from Rs. 2 lakhs to the intended Rs. 1 lac. The decision emphasized the significance of precise record-keeping and the responsibility of court officers to aid in reaching accurate conclusions. Rectification was deemed essential to align the written order with the actual decision announced in open Court, ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 424 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application, correcting the redemption fine amount from Rs. 2 lakhs to the intended Rs. 1 lac. The decision emphasized the significance of precise record-keeping and the responsibility of court officers to aid in reaching accurate conclusions. Rectification was deemed essential to align the written order with the actual decision announced in open Court, ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>