<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115580</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the denial of credit on burnt goods and confirming the wrongly availed credit amount of Rs. 2,28,993. The appellants were held liable to pay interest under Section 11AB, with the impugned order being upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:15:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115580</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the denial of credit on burnt goods and confirming the wrongly availed credit amount of Rs. 2,28,993. The appellants were held liable to pay interest under Section 11AB, with the impugned order being upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>