<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 419 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115579</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalty imposed for importing the dredger and the duty assessment on PVC pipes supplied with the dredger. The decision was based on the absence of specific guidelines requiring approval for import and the classification of PVC pipes as an integral part of the dredger, as established in a previous case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=152578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 419 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115579</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalty imposed for importing the dredger and the duty assessment on PVC pipes supplied with the dredger. The decision was based on the absence of specific guidelines requiring approval for import and the classification of PVC pipes as an integral part of the dredger, as established in a previous case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=115579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>